tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post204376762056915376..comments2009-11-14T23:12:00.330+08:00Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comBlogger79125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-66888322174546607892009-11-14T23:12:00.330+08:002009-11-14T23:12:00.330+08:00Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium? <br />Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-22570169084700728752009-11-04T01:18:23.970+08:002009-11-04T01:18:23.970+08:00BobOki: No... only betas.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-56212196311448469292009-11-02T02:51:32.305+08:002009-11-02T02:51:32.305+08:00Many many tomato updates have been done since your last release rod, was hoping for an updated release. Keep up the great work man, loving your stuff.BobOkihttp://www.boboki.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-30925205498461720362009-10-26T03:51:55.419+08:002009-10-26T03:51:55.419+08:00@Teddy<br /><br />Yes you are probably right. I wasnt sure how to do a direct translation of MurmurHash into a jhash2 compatible function, so probably made some mistakes there.<br /><br />Any suggestions on a better implementation of the hash?Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-43277416588242584552009-10-21T05:02:02.048+08:002009-10-21T05:02:02.048+08:00It seems there&#39;s an error in the MurmurHash2 implementation in the latest SpeedMod 118. Parameter len passed to the jhash2() function is the number of *u32s* in the key. However, it&#39;s handled inside as if it was the number of *bytes*. This also affects all variations of jhash_Nword(). In my tests on the mips platform the fixed version actually was a little bit slower than lookup3. Please correct me if I&#39;m missing something here...Teddynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-90347309496424986442009-10-03T01:39:54.143+08:002009-10-03T01:39:54.143+08:00Yup, tweaking dnsmasq DNS cache configuration definitely helps. But it also depends, sometimes if your ISP has fast DNS servers, it might be faster to just bypass the DNS caching.Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-38450396207143603652009-09-28T05:17:39.725+08:002009-09-28T05:17:39.725+08:00Have you ever looked into tweaking dns? I put cache-size=10000 into Dnsmasq: Custom Configuration and after testing with ns_bench I did not notice any slowdown despite the bigger cache.<br /><br />Default (150)<br />29.98 MB / 18.63 MB (62.14%)<br /><br />Custom (10000)<br />29.98 MB / 17.95 MB (59.88%)<br /><br /><br />There&#39;s also a beta out for the first time so we will probably get 1.26 stable soon!<br />http://www.polarcloud.com/tomatoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-62014697740468413162009-09-01T02:18:26.662+08:002009-09-01T02:18:26.662+08:00@junianto: no nvram reset necessary, just upgrading is fineRodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-80917484489755180242009-09-01T00:12:19.753+08:002009-09-01T00:12:19.753+08:00hi Rod,<br /><br />from speedmod 1.17, <br />i&#39;ll just upgrade directly to 1.18?<br />or i should do some nvram reset?Juniantohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10390066727538096520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-90448407820817985172009-08-30T19:36:11.292+08:002009-08-30T19:36:11.292+08:00SpeedMod 118 changes:<br />- Changed hash functions for Linux IP fragment code (net hash exploit fix)<br />- Using Murmurhash instead of Jenkins for IP fragment code<br />- Some adjustments to the re-hash secret intervalRodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-23911406360117687982009-08-28T01:14:17.282+08:002009-08-28T01:14:17.282+08:00@mshts: In the earlier version when I was trying Murmurhash, I might have made some mistakes either in the code or testing. But I believe in this version Murmurhash is faster. So far so good at least.Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-28625406794330071382009-08-25T23:55:27.099+08:002009-08-25T23:55:27.099+08:00hey Rodney, you mentioned something about Murmurhash being slower than Jenkins&#39; Lookup3. was this ever changed or addressed?mshtshttp://mshts.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-41520385446764489652009-08-23T19:08:26.778+08:002009-08-23T19:08:26.778+08:00Yes, it appears to be fixed in 1.25 speedmod as well. I&#39;m pretty sure I never applied this fix myself long ago since I don&#39;t own a intel laptop so I had no problems, if someone else could confirm that reset their router settings after flashing 1.25 would be good.<br /><br /># nvram get wl_reg_mode<br />off<br /># nvram get wl0_reg_mode<br />off<br />#Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-45464261450778719582009-08-03T04:42:35.658+08:002009-08-03T04:42:35.658+08:00Hi Rod, <br /><br />This post http://www.linksysinfo.org/forums/showpost.php?p=338606&amp;postcount=1 seems to imply the latest tomato has the wireless lan mod. Does that mean your &quot;TIP: Fix for ND versions and Intel 2200BG cards:&quot; is no longer needed for your latest verson?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-87340602695847702972009-07-29T07:38:48.991+08:002009-07-29T07:38:48.991+08:00From Johnee:<br />This firmware is the best. Makes my router run fast and lean! When is the next iteration coming, and could you also support USB (FTP server) as a lean and mean combo?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-71823624289011711832009-07-06T21:27:05.004+08:002009-07-06T21:27:05.004+08:00Use ND only for certain newer routers. Check this thread for more info:<br /><br />http://www.linksysinfo.org/forums/showthread.php?t=59920Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-5545325243092252052009-06-30T04:24:58.415+08:002009-06-30T04:24:58.415+08:00Hi, I read all the comments and one person asked what is the difference between the &quot;New Driver&quot; version and the regular one.<br /><br />No response was given but I&#39;d also like to know the answer. What is the difference?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-893816530269202182009-06-05T02:47:28.217+08:002009-06-05T02:47:28.217+08:00@lofi<br /><br />Try the TFTP procedure mentioned here:<br /><br />http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Recover_from_a_Bad_Flash#Buffalo_WHR-HP-G54_soft_repairRodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-77610744590822988102009-06-03T10:23:54.422+08:002009-06-03T10:23:54.422+08:00Hi all,<br /><br />I recently upgrade the tomato v1.25 firmware through tomato GUI to my buffalo WHR-HP-G54 router. <br /><br />In the middle of the process it showed the error &quot;Error erase MTD block&quot; then follow by a reboot. After that i can&#39;t access the router. <br /><br />May i know does it have any other way to access the router and re-flash the firmware?I had google it but unfortunately i can&#39;t get any relevant info.<br /><br />Thankslofinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-89520263323402316652009-05-28T04:45:32.350+08:002009-05-28T04:45:32.350+08:00New official version !!!<br /><br />http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato_125Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-18884583264375625112009-05-21T05:05:06.381+08:002009-05-21T05:05:06.381+08:00Hello,<br /><br />I'm using the modified version of 1.23 that enables the USB port on the Asus WL-520GU (the default version does not support the USB). Can you supply a version of the USB capable 1.23 with your speed mods?<br /><br />Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-92079929961177987732009-05-20T18:44:38.030+08:002009-05-20T18:44:38.030+08:00very cool postweb design Indiahttp://www.vijayinfo.innoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-45157493231600051052009-02-09T22:13:00.000+08:002009-02-09T22:13:00.000+08:00Hi rod. I'm sorry, because it's an interference in my network that makes the wireless disconnect. I just change the firmware and the day after, all my wireless slow down. Now i see that is not a firmware problem. In my case it's interference. SorryJknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-81991425383050387692009-02-09T21:17:00.000+08:002009-02-09T21:17:00.000+08:00Hi guys, Tomato shouldn't cause any problems with wireless disconnects, vs other firmwares. Try changing to a different Wifi channel if you have disconnects.<BR/><BR/>Or you can also try implementing nvram settings fix for "Intel 2200BG cards", not sure if will help or not.Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08884639342415139317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13667883.post-12472068303728061902009-02-02T23:49:00.000+08:002009-02-02T23:49:00.000+08:00I'he very wireless disconnects too. Betwen 8h and 13h, my wireless keep disconnect, then it comes again, then disconnect, and comes again. I've tried all mods and it's the same. I was affraid that it could be interference but i have tried all channels, 5mw to 251 and it's the same. I have a WL500gp v2. On linksys seems to work fineJknoreply@blogger.com